CEM: Everything You Need to Know


Explore the world of Composite Extrusion Modeling (CEM) in 3D printing, a comprehensive guide comparing CEM with FFF, FDM, FGF, LAM, and GDP technologies.

by Editorial Staff: We are a team of 3D Printing Enthusiasts who have build a lot of knowledge about 3D Printing the last 8 years. Our aim is to create the knowledge hub for 3D Printing covering all minor and major topics. Providing one source of reliable Information for everybody regardless of Beginner or Expert.

Introduction to CEM Technology

Composite Extrusion Modeling (CEM) is a cutting-edge technology in the realm of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. This blog post delves into the intricacies of CEM, comparing it with other 3D printing technologies, and exploring its pros and cons.

Understanding CEM in the Context of 3D Printing

CEM is a derivative of Material Extrusion (MEX) technology, sharing core principles but advancing in certain aspects. It’s crucial to understand MEX to fully appreciate the innovations brought by CEM.

Material Extrusion (MEX): The Foundation

Material Extrusion is the parent technology for many 3D printing methods, including CEM. It involves extruding material through a nozzle to build objects layer by layer. This method is widely used due to its simplicity and adaptability.

CEM vs. Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)

FFF, also known as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), is a common MEX-based technology. While FFF uses continuous filament, CEM advances this by utilizing granules, offering more material options and enhanced properties.

CEM and Fused Granulate Fabrication (FGF)

CEM shares similarities with FGF, especially in the use of granules. However, CEM stands out in its ability to handle composite materials, broadening its application scope.

Exploring Liquid Additive Manufacturing (LAM)

LAM differs significantly from CEM as it involves liquid materials cured layer by layer. CEM’s use of solid granules offers distinct mechanical properties and material choices compared to LAM’s approach.

Gel Dispensing Printing (GDP)

GDP, another distinct technology, focuses on depositing gel-like materials. CEM, with its emphasis on granular composites, caters to a different set of applications, primarily in the industrial sector.

The Advantages of CEM

  • Material Versatility: CEM’s use of granules allows for a broader range of materials, including high-performance composites.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Granules are generally cheaper than filaments or resins, making CEM a cost-efficient option.
  • Enhanced Properties: Composite materials in CEM offer improved strength and functionality.

The Limitations of CEM

  • Complexity in Material Handling: Managing granules and composites can be more challenging than handling standard filaments.
  • Limited Resolution: CEM may not achieve the fine detail possible with some other technologies, like stereolithography (SLA).

Comparing CEM with Other Technologies

CEM stands out in its ability to handle composite materials, offering unique advantages in strength and material diversity. However, technologies like FFF and SLA may be better suited for applications requiring high precision and detail.


CEM represents a significant step forward in 3D printing technology, particularly in its use of composite materials. While it offers distinct advantages in terms of material diversity and cost, it also presents unique challenges in terms of resolution and material handling.


What is CEM in 3D printing? CEM is an advanced 3D printing technology using composite material granules for additive manufacturing.

How does CEM differ from FFF? CEM uses granules instead of filaments, allowing for a wider range of materials and composite options.

What are the main advantages of CEM? CEM offers material versatility, cost-efficiency, and enhanced mechanical properties.

What limitations does CEM have? CEM can be complex in material handling and might not achieve the high resolution of some other 3D printing methods.

Is CEM suitable for detailed printing? While versatile in materials, CEM may not be the best option for applications requiring ultra-fine detail.

Disclosure: Our content is reader-supported. This means if you click on some of our links, then we may earn a commission. Your price is the same regardless but you help us a lot.